Sandpaper of "velvet revolution»

Or Why it is ruined implementatsija

«From a place of political fights and the generator of impulses of instability the Supreme Rada has aloud promoted in the decisions and actions towards constructibility, prognoziruemosti and responsibility. Activization, qualitative improvement of legislative process, the big coordination of efforts and cooperation between the Supreme Rada, the government and the President have yielded powerful and real practical fruits». Such appreciation was given by the President of Ukraine to parliament job for last year in the presence of representatives of a diplomatic corps. Really, expressions are picked up extremely diplomatic. In other circumstances and at other audience, especially somewhere on departure in regions, estimations to parliament from Leonid Kuchma's lips usually sound a little more rigid and rectilinear. However, the head of the state has specified, that «such transformation of political conditions» has happened not by itself and is far not of own will inhabitants of a building in the street Grushevsky, and «results of presidential elections and a referendum on a popular initiative promoted it first of all». That is usual "stimulation" in critical situations of the deputy case took place. And as a whole the parliament should be pleasantly surprised by a presidential estimation — «five with a minus» instead of "neuda" on behaviour. In the light of last events it would be possible to expect absolutely other reaction. Charges in «destruktivnosti and neprognoziruemosti» simply arise vsledstvii with constantly warmed up opposition of an antipresidential fever. Legislative process deserves the rigid presidential criticism as at deputies recently much more time leaves on political debates, than on acceptance, for example, of some for a long time promised codes. Well and coordination of efforts between power branches is simply painful point when the parliamentary majority regularly shares on unequal parts on the basis of the relation either to the government, or to the president. But that-that, and «instability impulses» — though take away...

The President considers as the main task of current year preservation of the parliamentary majority and «fastening of that constructive spirit by which have been noted practically in a current of all last year of the relation between the President, the government and parliament». However a question what, actually, to save? What is this majority to which in a week year will be executed? Short of formally existing list of 275 deputies which actually anything among themselves does not connect to track its existence and ability to live it is problematic enough. Especially, if to be guided by ability to live products. Yes, laws, really, are accepted. But after all and earlier they were accepted with the same variable success. Have voted for the bill initiated by an executive power — there is a majority. Have not voted — too is, only the oppositional. And proceeds: It was necessary to pass the law about implementatsii in the first reading — have collected the propresidential majority, it was necessary to issue the law on electric power industry — to the progovernmental fractions have added communists and the progovernmental majority has turned out, and have wanted to "fill up" silovikov — here you are practically antipresidential majority. There are only eternal interests, and with everyone the. And the further, the more personal interests prevail over feeling of a Bolshevist collectivism. Even the Coordination council of the majority reflecting for development of co-ordinated decisions, has turned to debatable club of leaders of fractions. It is possible to talk, find out positions of colleagues, and there — voting will show... Not speaking already about implementatsii results of a referendum with which someone has obviously got excited in due time. Now podi get out of this ball. The adviser of prime minister Sergey Sobolev even offers in case of a failure implementatsii results of a referendum to raise the question about responsibility of its initiators. Probably, means the well-known Zhitomir initiative group which has formally made these porridge one year ago.

As a matter of fact, at all subjects implementatsionnogo process does not remain other way, except how to drag out on the greatest possible distance. It is obvious, that 300 voices for the presidential bill approved at the previous session of changes in the Constitution to collect it was not real. As is known, he assumed to introduce three of four innovations approved by the people in the Constitution: parliamentary immunity liquidation as concepts, granting to the president of the additional rights on dissolution of parliament and reduction on third of general population of deputies. « Impassability »such bill has been predetermined. Moreover, even having managed to agree with a part left (on what leaders of the majority once counted), to bring an attention to the question on voting all the same it was terrible. And suddenly someone will change the mind or only will pretend to be"agreed". 300 voices are not typed also the bill automatically acts in film from consideration. And the main thing, to the same question it will be already impossible to return within a year. And there already and elections on a nose so also the new parliament will live under old laws and in known relations with the President. In general,"referendumali"in vain. Not it is for nothing on conciliatory council of leaders of fractions on immediate voting by the presidential bill so Alexander Eljashkevich actively insisted. He is difficult for suspecting of adherence of idea of strengthening of the presidential power. What is, first all even somehow in a temper with it have agreed and have decided to recommend to bring to the Supreme Rada a question in the agenda on Thursday. But in time have thought again.

Thus, on the agenda there were two new implementatsionnyh the document. The first — the cut down variant of that presidential bill altered, to be exact. Commission Gavrisha has left in him unique point — about additional powers of the President as regards parliament dissolution: for untimely acceptance of the budget and for absence of constantly operating parliamentary majority. As a matter of fact — the same, but from the legal point of view — the new document which on procedure should be to begin with approved the Constitutional court, and then is accepted at the following session by 300 voices. The second — the bill «About the parliamentary majority and parliamentary opposition», called to counterbalance reeled because of a referendum in favour of the president balance of forces between power branches. Except an explanation of the most indistinct concept «constantly operating majority», it gives it the right to take part in government formation. However, really to compensate presidential overweight the document all the same not in a condition — it is rather weak. Yes, one month prior to purpose of the prime minister the President should consult with the majority about its nominee. Yes, one month prior to purpose of ministers of premieres should ask also council the majority. Here only any the President, the prime minister before the majority do not bear obligations. Can listen to council, and can and ignore. And ministers can work according to a wish rekomendatelej, and can and how will want — about resignation the recommendation can be given also only. And here the majority «constantly to operate» is obliged, want do not want — the constitutional norm. Otherwise all — dissolution. Though, full illusion of influence on an executive power. And on the business most that, the one who appoints supervises at all, and the one who dismisses. And the President dismisses all personally.

Thus, the parliament from acceptance of the "compensating" law really does not receive any advantages. It was visually shown on Wednesday by Victor Yushchenko at a meeting with leaders of fractions of the majority. That he it has told literally, precisely it is not known. Everyone has understood in own way. All converge that the prime minister has asked to pass of members of parliament laws about implementatsii referendum results that basically is not peculiar to traditionally apolitical head of the government. The Press-secretary of prime minister Natalia Zarudnaja interpreted its some words so, that from next week Victor Yushchenko is ready to start also consultations of parliament about formation of the coalition government, «to develop the mechanism of its functioning, procedures and regulations as this question new to Ukraine and actually is not fulfilled». Speaker Ivan Pljushch has specified, that «Victor Andreevich never refused carrying out of such consultations and in the beginning of 7th session is ready to listen to offers of deputy groups and fractions on their vision of structure of the government». And the adviser of prime minister Sergey Sobolev has added, that speech can go about consultations on separate nominees on some governmental posts. And any laws on the majority it is not necessary — and so can consult to itself though every day. And further that? With whom and about what is going to to agree Yushchenko if anybody with anybody did not agree about him? He will count what offers of fractions constructive and with what will disagree a priori? Whether can after that the majority to incur responsibility for government activity? Perhaps, for some time, before the next strain of relations between VR and KM. As it, actually, always also turned out...

As it, actually, always also turned out, so and proceeded in the presence of the law.

It is difficult to tell, whether such logic in parliament on Thursday has prevailed, but in the agenda the law on the majority to bring and it was not possible. The law on modification of the Constitution has been in the same way blocked. As well as political scientists, voices the offended power of fraction "Батькивщина" predicted earlier at support of "Reforms-congresses" (instead of UNR!) Has sufficed for creation critical antiimplementatsionnoj weight. The compromise did not leave, and the majority has once again proved the inconsistency. And here already Alexander Volkov giving 1000 % for implementatsiju, has started talking about parliament self-dissolution. Certainly. The president in a present political situation hardly will go on power dispersal of parliament. To justify such step neglect deputies will of the people in the opinion of world community it is already unreal. And how not to recollect Ivan Pljushcha's word, promising to combine from itself deputy powers in case of majority disorder. Legally the majority does not exist, and is only self-proclaimed education therefore it is possible to consider as a formal sign of its disintegration everything. Entirely the real and discussed scenario — the speaker leaves, on sessions also are not it zamy, the parliament is paralysed by blocked separate fractions attempts to choose a new management, within a month of session do not renew also the President officially and quite konstitutsionno declares early election of People's Deputies. Though self-dissolution is possible also. Possibly, communists will be not against — the new law completely arranging them on elections exclusively on a proportional basis is providently accepted same Thursday. Though the President still has a possibility it not to sign. Now he can individually choose between two electoral systems: existing mixed or new proportional, the veto or the signature. And at this choice opinions far not all parties and politicians will be considered. It is not excluded, as in a propresidential camp sharp discussion concerning the further destiny of parliament will inflame. If Aleksand Wolves in an emotional impulse it is already ready to preschedule selective fights Victor Medvedchuk all the same counts easy dosidet in vitse-spikerskom an armchair till 2002. There are doubts in a solvency at competitive party struggle and some other centres of influence. All it means that in parliament is still saved some resource of self-preservation.

Here such «strengthening of political stability» turns out... Apparently, the majority has made the business and now can be free. Instability impulses are generated by it with escalating frequency by which soon it is necessary to measure in kilohertz. In difference from power, in the politician with system disorder frequency excess threatens.

© 2007 Igor Meshov! Site support young russian teens from ss teens team. [On main]